John is also rumored become associated with Abraham Lincoln for some reason courtesy certainly one of Lincoln’s Grannies

Android Hookup Apps reviews / By domjamesphillips

It appears to be Anna are the youngest off this lady sisters – Anna was just 5 whenever their mother died and you may 17 when the woman dad passed away.

JOHN

Parents John Porter out-of Tapenhall (1560-1625); kid off Thomas Porter Anne-marie CALVERT Sybil VESSEY (1561-1625); girl of Thomas Vessey E Chapel

John Porter’s line try reported to go completely upwards on the Norman Knight, William de- los angeles Grande just who battled and William new Conqueror within the 1066, from the Race of Hastings.

Francis Porter (1585-1635); Spouses: Joan DRAPER, Joan SMITH
Margaret PORTER Nash (1587-1628); Spouse: ______ Nash
Frances PORTER (1588-1635); Spouse: John Draper
Thomas Porter II (1590-1638) – he could be a great II? Having We?
William Porter (1596-1635)
Sophistication Ann PORTER (abt 1598-1659); Spouse: William Judson Jr
Flower PORTER (1598-1635); Spouse: ___ Wentworth
John Porter (out-of Narragansett) (1605-1674); < . – Come across less than “Not all of our Colonial Child”

Hmm. Did they actually possess a male Francis and you may a lady Frances exactly who one another parece was equivalent (Joan – John)? Stranger things have happened, but this makes me inquire and requires lookup.

In which around the globe?

To have a concept of proximity, Felsted and you will Fooling go for about 14 miles out of each other, if you find yourself Shalford is approximately 6 miles northern and you will a bit east away from Felsted.

Perhaps not Our very own COLONIAL Son…

The John Porter shouldn’t be mistaken for several other John Porter whom arrived in The newest England into the 1633. You to definitely John Porter is a good signer of your Portsmouth Lightweight from inside the what turned the fresh Colony of Rhode Area, lived-in Boston and you may was among the many fresh people regarding the brand new Pettaquamscutt lands (after South Kingstown, Rhode Island). The guy watched conflict and judge for deserting their girlfriend after inside the lifetime and trying out for the former common-laws girlfriend out of a keen upstanding member of the city. This isn’t our very own kid. However,, the Geni webpage to possess wife deserter John (aka John Porter of Narragansett) states that he’s an aunt to the John – a couple sis Johns regarding the household members? Hmmm. I have gotta state, I am not saying pretty sure. I would look into that it at another time, yet not today.

Nor would be to the John feel confused with the series of John Porter’s whom starred in Virginia by the 1642, however they are probably relevant, because there are strong evidence they were descended off Edmund Porter of Tapenhall. That it loved ones line as well as happens to claim a couple of brother Johns in the same family unit members. Try this family relations incapable of thinking upwards people names? lol.

A special John Porter to not end up being confused with ours try John Porter Sr., an effective , MA right after which thinking of moving Salem, in which he was https://datingranking.net/android-hookup-apps/ the patriarch of your wealthiest relatives from the urban area. So it John Porter is found on a listing of Individuals of the latest Salem Witch Products underneath the sub group “not indicted”.

John Porter-Anna Light Wedding

John Porter and Anna Light was basically hitched 18 October 1620 in the Most of the Saints Church from inside the Messing, Essex, The united kingdomt depending on Messing Parish records.

Note: I’ve seen one or more record one incorporated a primary girlfriend to own John, stating the guy married a beneficial Margaret Odding when you look at the 1606 in the Madron, Cornwall, The united kingdomt, where she died into the 1671. Although not, the John might have simply already been several during which wedding; An easy research means that Margaret Odding married you to other John Porter (mentioned above) – I’m sure, I’m sure – you to definitely John might have merely come on the a year-old founded into dates provided – but he isn’t my John, therefore i may not be looking with the which, however if they are yours, you then is to!